July 9, 2010 -- FLOW FROM THE WELLHEAD MIGHT BE SUB-FREEZING

The temperature of the oil coming from the wellhead might be sub-freezing, due to the dissolution of methane from the liquid oil as it flows upward from its deep, high-pressure reservoir. Perhaps cold enough to cause seawater to freeze.

The drop in temperature when dissolved gases come out of solution can be seen if a bottle of carbonated soft drink is chilled to 0C, or a few degrees less, and then opened. An ice slurry will form in the liquid, a slurry thick enough to block the pouring of soda from the bottle.

In early May when the 100-ton containment dome failed to capture the flow of oil and gas, the failure was attributed to the spontaneous and rapid formation of methane hydrate.

However, an article from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, "Methane Hydrate: A Surprising Compound," suggests that methane hydrate is difficult to synthesize, which implies that hydrate formation might be slow in nature. In addition, though the article does not say it, it seems plausible that the process of hydrate formation, because it entraps gas molecules that might would otherwise be moving rapidly, would be exothermic and therefore self-limiting with respect to rate of hydrate formation.

An alternative explanation for the failure of the containment dome involves ordinary water ice, which formed when the already cool sea water encountered, inside the small volume of the containment dome, a sub- freezing plume of gas and oil coming from the wellhead. That is conjecture, that the plume would be that cold, but here is the basis for thinking it:

When gas comes out of solution from a liquid, as happens when the aforementioned bottle of chilled carbonated soft drink is opened and CO2 comes out of solution, the process of dissolution involves the release of fast-moving molecules of carbon dioxide, which means that the temperature of the liquid left behind would get lower.

The flow rate of gas from the wellhead is reported to have been between 110,000 and 480,000 cubic meters per day. That's presumably at STP. Compare that to ~6,500 to ~13,000 cubic meters of oil per day (40,000 to 80,000 barrels of petroleum per day coming from the wellhead [my estimate] at ~6.3 barrels per cubic meter).

Clearly, gas is coming out of solution from the oil. It seems likely that the gas was dissolved in the petroleum prior to being emitted from the wellhead, especially when it was deep in the well and in the reservoir itself. Similar to carbonated water, it is methanated petroleum.

The gaseous portion must come out of solution from the liquid portion as the petroleum rises to the wellhead from its deep reservoir; that is, the dissolution happens because of the pressure decrease as the flow moves from the deep reservoir to the wellhead. In addition, the turbulent interaction of the oil with the wall of the pipe would further provoke dissolution, just as shaking a soft drink can or bottle causes the CO2 to come out of solution. It is plausible to assume that the temperature of the oil flow decreases as the gas portion comes out of solution.

It follows, given the >80 days of oil and gas flow, that the well itself and the adjacent rock, out to several meters laterally, might be at a sub-freezing temperature.

It would interesting to secure a mesh grating over the top of the wellhead when the relief well is joined to the main well, and then to inject fresh water so as to form an icy slurry that might at least slow the flow as it clogs the mesh.

Or, with such a grating securely in place, the earlier idea of a "junk shot," but from the relief well, might impede the flow; and the addition of fresh water might slow it yet further, perhaps stopping it completely long enough for heavy mud and/or concrete to be injected into the deepest portions of the well, below where the relief well intersects it.

 

Send comments to Bob

Back to Main Vapor Blog Page

Back to Flash Evaporator Page